Strip away the post-election commentary, and last week’s midterm results come down to a number most households now know by heart: what they pay every month to keep the lights on, the house warm, and the car fueled.
Democrats took both chambers of Congress, and the market responded immediately. First Solar, Sunrun, and Enphase rose close to double digits the day after the vote, as investors bet that a Democratic Congress will block further rollbacks of clean energy policy. Barclays analyst Peter Crampton wrote that the result “potentially reduces the risk of further political interference with renewable energy incentives and provides greater protection for the long-term economics of U.S. wind, solar and battery storage investments.”
Still, the enthusiasm is running ahead of the math. The president still holds the veto pen (and the hat), and Democrats don’t have the votes to override that veto power on their own. CNBC suggests some Republicans may be willing to help, to appeal to voters angry about energy prices, but that’s a bet, not a plan.
Morningstar’s Tancrede Fulop doesn’t expect the federal solar tax credit to be reinstated, and Section 232 and 301 tariffs are likely to stay in place. The one federal item worth watching closely is the bipartisan permitting bill, which some Democrats want to hold until January so they can rewrite provisions to favor renewables over fossil fuel projects.
Elections aside, the renewables sector undeniably marches on. BloombergNEF projects the U.S. will add a record 89 gigawatts of clean energy capacity by the end of 2026, with more expected in 2027. The Clean Investment Monitor (Rhodium Group and MIT) counted $75 billion invested in clean energy and transportation in the second quarter alone, the second-highest quarter on record, and $277 billion over the past four quarters across renewable generation, clean vehicles, building electrification, and carbon management. Even after the administration’s efforts to claw back federal clean energy funding, a Politico analysis found that nearly $600 billion of the original $1.6 trillion remains available.
Energy costs were on the ballot almost everywhere. Heating bills drove races in Maine, rising power bills in Montana, and rates and reliability in Michigan. In Georgia, after repeated rate hikes tied to data center demand, voters gave Democrats a majority on the Public Service Commission for the first time in 30 years. Colorado voters rejected a constitutional right to natural gas. And voters in 10 states weighed in on 41 local data center initiatives, from outright bans to construction pauses to limits on energy use. All but one passed.
None of that was a referendum on carbon—it was a referendum on cost, and the housing sector can learn a lot from the results. For decades, housing economics have optimized for first cost and ignored full cost. But voters just ran the full-cost math themselves. They looked at rising monthly utility bills, outrageous insurance premiums, soaring material prices.
Those numbers, in conjunction with fuel prices pushed higher by the conflict in Iran and data centers that aren’t slowing down (Goldman Sachs projects data center power demand will grow 38% in both 2026 and 2027, ballot measures notwithstanding), brought them to the conclusion that the old system is no longer feasible or affordable.
The most consequential energy decisions of the next two years won’t happen in Congress. They’ll happen in statehouses and utility commissions. Democrats gained full control of state government in Wisconsin, Arizona, and Pennsylvania, and Vote Solar’s Sean Garren points to new clean energy majorities in Nevada, Minnesota, and Michigan as well.
Pennsylvania House Democrats have already said they plan to pass community solar, warehouse solar, and battery storage bills, and to stop local governments from banning renewables. New Democratic trifectas could give distributed energy and virtual power plants a significant boost.
Perhaps most importantly for builders, developers, architects, and related professionals, interconnection rules, net metering, rate design, community solar, and storage incentives are all set at the state level, and they determine whether a solar-plus-storage home pencils out or becomes a hard sell.
Every home with solar, storage, a heat pump, and a tight envelope lowers demand on the grid when it’s most stressed, cuts household operating costs, and keeps a family safe when the power goes out. In a market where demand is surging and rates are escalating, renewables shift from being a lifestyle upgrade to an essential strategy for risk management.
A home that generates and stores its own power is worth more over its life and has a higher Value per Square Foot, even though our appraisal, lending, and insurance systems don’t count that value correctly yet.
Change in political control is not the finish line, especially because policy whiplash makes projects harder to finance. The lesson of the past two years is that a federal incentive can disappear in a single budget bill. Companies that built their business models on a tax credit learned how fragile that foundation is.
The clock is already ticking on the credits that survived. Under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, solar and wind projects had to begin construction by July 4 of this year, or be placed in service by the end of 2027, to qualify. That’s why the economics matter more than the politics. “We know that renewables are the lowest cost form of new-build generation, even on a fully unsubsidized basis,” Justina Lai, chief impact officer at LNW, told CNBC.
The durable case for renewable energy, and for high-performance homes, has to stand on those economics: lower operating costs, resilience, and value that holds over time. Incentives can accelerate that case, but they shouldn’t be load-bearing.
So what should builders, developers, manufacturers, and investors do with the next 12 months?
Watch your state, not just Washington. Know who sits on your public utility commission and what your legislature plans for net metering, storage, and community solar.
Lead with cost, not carbon. Buyers just told us what they care about: they want lower monthly costs and transparency around total cost of homeownership. They want to see the numbers, so show them the numbers!
Build for the grid we’re going to have. Future-proof your business and your clients’ homes by making them storage-ready, electrification-ready, and able to participate in virtual power plants.
Document the value. Track operating costs and resilience performance so the value shows up at the closing table, not just in the marketing brochure.
The election didn’t settle the energy debate, but it did spotlight that the primary question that consumers are asking has changed: Voters have stopped asking whether we can afford clean energy and started asking whether we can afford the system we have.
Publisher’s Note: This content is made possible by our Today’s Homeowner Campaign Sponsor: ProVia.
Learn more about building and buying homes that are more affordable and less resource intensive.
Explore the COGNITION Smart Data web page, and book a demo today to find out what COGNITION can do for your business!